Review the basic records
Check the crash date, location, vehicles, photos, exchange information, report number, and your first medical visits.
Florida car accident insurance guide
An insurer may ask to record your account after a Florida crash. Before agreeing, identify the insurer, why the statement is requested, any duty to cooperate, and whether legal advice is appropriate.

Not every request is legally equivalent. Your own insurer may rely on policy duties and, for Florida PIP benefits, section 627.736(6)(g) addresses compliance with policy terms, including an examination under oath when required by the policy. The other driver's liability insurer does not have that same contractual relationship with you. Before answering substantive questions, identify who is asking, why the statement is requested, and whether it is an ordinary recorded interview or a formal examination under oath.
Start with the relationship. Your own insurer may be investigating benefits under your policy. The other driver's liability carrier is evaluating a claim against its insured.
A recorded interview gives the adjuster a fixed account that can be compared with the crash report, photographs, medical records, vehicle damage, witness statements, and later communications. The questions usually focus on both fault and the claimed losses.
The adjuster may ask where each vehicle was traveling, lane positions, traffic signals, speed, braking, weather, visibility, point of impact, and what happened immediately before and after the collision.
Florida uses comparative fault rules. Statements about distraction, speed, lane changes, following distance, or what you saw before impact may become important when an insurer argues that more than one person contributed to the crash.
Expect questions about symptoms at the scene, emergency care, later treatment, diagnoses, missed work, current limitations, prior injuries, and whether the same body part had been treated before the crash.
Your own insurer may ask who was driving, whether the vehicle was used for work or rideshare activity, who lived in the household, what other insurance may apply, and whether another policy or benefit source is involved.

You do not need to start answering substantive questions just because an adjuster called. First identify the request and preserve the details of the conversation.
Confirm the purpose before discussing fault, injuries, prior medical history, or settlement. If the caller represents the other driver, you can obtain the adjuster's information and return the call after deciding how the claim should be handled. If the request comes from your own insurer, review the policy and the specific type of requested examination before refusing or postponing it.
A first-party claim is different because the policy may impose cooperation, document, medical examination, or examination-under-oath duties. The exact coverage and policy language matter.
Ask whether the request concerns PIP, collision, uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, medical payments, or another part of the policy, and why the interview is needed.
A routine phone interview and a formal EUO are not interchangeable. If the insurer says a statement is required, ask for the policy language or written request that explains the obligation.
Florida Statutes section 627.736 provides that an insured seeking PIP benefits must comply with policy terms, including submitting to an examination under oath when required by the policy. The statute limits EUO questioning to relevant information or information reasonably expected to lead to relevant information.
If you have not reviewed the crash report, photographs, treatment records, or your own notes, do not estimate a detail you do not remember. State clearly when you do not know or do not recall.
The liability carrier is investigating whether its insured is responsible and what the claim may be worth. That does not create the same policy-based cooperation duty that exists with your own insurer.
Clarify whether the request concerns property damage, bodily injury, liability, coverage, or several issues. A vehicle-inspection question is different from a broad interview about medical history.
A third-party claimant generally is not bound by the cooperation clause in the other driver's policy. Formal discovery duties are different and can arise later if litigation begins.
The carrier may need facts to investigate the claim, but information can sometimes be provided through documents, a written response, or counsel rather than an open-ended recorded call.
Florida Statutes section 627.4137 allows a claimant to request specified liability insurance information in writing, including policy limits and a copy of the policy. That disclosure right is separate from a request to record your statement.
Problems usually come from guessing, accepting a loaded conclusion, or describing injuries more broadly than the facts support. Accuracy matters more than speed.
| Question area | Common mistake | Safer approach |
|---|---|---|
| Speed and distance | Guessing an exact speed, number of car lengths, or number of seconds when you did not measure it. | Give only what you actually remember. Say when an estimate is only an estimate. |
| Fault | Agreeing with a loaded conclusion such as “so you could have avoided the crash” when the facts are more complicated. | Describe what you saw and did rather than adopting the adjuster's legal conclusion. |
| Injuries | Saying “I'm fine” or “nothing serious” before symptoms, testing, or treatment have developed. | Describe current symptoms accurately and avoid predicting your recovery. |
| Prior medical history | Saying you never had a prior problem when you do not remember an old visit, or giving an unrestricted medical history. | Be truthful and precise. Distinguish prior conditions from new symptoms or aggravation without guessing. |
| Work and activity limits | Overstating or understating what you can do on a good day or bad day. | Use concrete examples tied to actual missed work, restrictions, or daily tasks. |
Florida Statutes section 768.81 reduces damages according to a claimant's percentage of fault. For negligence actions covered by the statute, a party found more than 50 percent at fault for their own harm may not recover damages, subject to statutory exceptions. That makes accurate answers about speed, distraction, lane position, and visibility important, while fault still depends on the full evidence record.
Preparation does not mean rehearsing a story. Review the crash report, photographs, treatment dates, claim correspondence, and other records that can help you answer accurately without guessing.
Check the crash date, location, vehicles, photos, exchange information, report number, and your first medical visits.
List the collision, symptoms, treatment, missed work, and important follow-up events in chronological order.
Confirm whether the interview concerns liability, PIP, UM coverage, property damage, injuries, or a formal EUO.
Keep answers accurate and complete, but do not fill silence with guesses, assumptions, or unrelated information.

People sometimes use these terms loosely, but the procedure and legal setting can be very different. Confirm exactly what is being requested.
Usually an insurer or adjuster records a claim interview. It may be relatively informal, but the recording creates a fixed account that can affect the insurer's evaluation of fault, coverage, and damages.
An EUO is a more formal policy-based claim investigation procedure. It is conducted under oath and may involve detailed questioning and documents. For Florida PIP benefits, section 627.736(6)(g) requires an insured seeking benefits to comply with policy terms, including an EUO when required by the policy, and makes compliance with that paragraph a condition precedent to receiving benefits.
A deposition is formal discovery in a lawsuit. It is governed by court rules, taken under oath, and normally transcribed by a court reporter. Litigation obligations are different from an adjuster's pre-suit phone request.
Trial testimony is evidence presented in court under the rules of evidence and procedure. Earlier statements may still matter if they conflict with later testimony, which is one reason accuracy from the beginning is important.
Giving a statement does not automatically end a claim. Preserve what happened on the call and compare the statement with contemporaneous records before responding to a dispute.
Record the date, adjuster, insurer, claim number, approximate duration, and subjects discussed while your memory is fresh.
For a Florida PIP claim, section 627.736(6)(d) provides that, upon request, the injured person must be furnished a copy of information obtained by the insurer under that section, subject to a reasonable charge if required. Outside that setting, access to a recording or transcript can depend on the insurer, policy, and type of examination.
If an answer was wrong or incomplete, preserve the records that show the correct information and decide how the clarification should be made.
If the insurer relies on one answer to dispute fault, causation, or damages, compare it with the full statement and supporting evidence rather than the excerpt alone.
Legal review can be useful when a statement may affect disputed liability, coverage, medical causation, or damages, and when the insurer is requesting a formal EUO or several policies may apply.
The key questions are whether the statement is required, what policy language applies, and what records should be reviewed first. For a broader case review, see the Florida car accident lawyer page or use the Florida car accident claim checker.
Generally, you do not have a contractual duty to give the other driver's liability insurer a recorded statement merely because its adjuster asks. The carrier may still request information to investigate the claim, and litigation can create separate discovery duties later.
Possibly, depending on the coverage and policy language. Ask what provision the insurer is relying on and whether it wants an ordinary recorded interview or an examination under oath. For Florida PIP benefits, section 627.736(6)(g) addresses compliance with policy terms, including an EUO when required by the policy.
No. A routine recorded claim interview is generally less formal. An EUO is taken under oath and is usually based on policy provisions or, in the PIP context, the statutory framework. Confirm an EUO request in writing and review the applicable policy language.
Say that you do not know or do not remember. Do not guess. If a crash report, photograph, calendar, or medical record can answer the question more reliably, use the record rather than inventing a precise detail.
It can affect how an insurer evaluates fault, coverage, injuries, and damages, especially when an answer conflicts with later records or testimony. The main risk is inaccurate, speculative, incomplete, or unnecessarily broad answers.

Free consultation
If you were injured, fault is disputed, or an insurer is asking for a recorded statement or examination under oath, The Nunez Law Firm can review the request and explain how it may affect your claim.
No fee unless we win. Available 24/7 for new clients in Orlando, Fort Myers, and across Florida.
(407) 203-2769